Search The Complex Litigator
Recent Tweets
Facebook
The Complex Litigator Online
Categories
Alltop, all the top stories
Powered by Squarespace
« Supreme Court holds that a single statue of limitation governs Labor Code section 203 claims | Main | BREAKING NEWS: Pineda v. Bank of America, N.A. decision to be released November 18, 2010 »
Wednesday
Nov172010

Supreme Court activity for the week of November 15, 2010

The California Supreme Court held its (usually) weekly conference on November 17, 2010.  Notable results include:

  • On a Petition for Review, review was granted in  in Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection, Inc. (July 27, 2010), covered previously here.  The issue under review is limited as follows:  "Does Labor Code section 218.5 govern attorney's fees awarded on a cause of action alleging violation of the statutorily mandated wage payment for missed meal and rest periods (Lab. Code, [sec.] 226.7), or is an attorney's fee award governed by Labor Code section 1194?"
  • On a Request for Depublication, depublication was denied in Nelson v. Pearson Ford Co. (July 15, 2010).  Prior comments from this blog are here.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>